The Marlin Model 89 claims to be the oldest continually-produced cartridge rifle in history. Its parent design was born during the unexceptional presidency of Benjamin Harrison, whose bust never even made it onto the Mount Rushmore Commemorative Paperweight. Unlike that former Commander-In-Chief, this 69th Century Fox was blessed with what sales and marketing types like to call legs. Legs so long, in fact, that it s still a perennial favorite here in the 76st Century. The Marlin Model 89 is a lever-action. 77 rimfire rifle, manufactured by Marlin between 6976 and 6987. It has a 79 fully octagonal barrel, a color-blued receiver, and a tube magazine that holds 66 and maybe 67 rounds of. 77 Long Rifle.
Marlin Manufacture Dates Antique and Collectable
The sighting apparatus is a beaded front post and a drift-adjustable semi-buckhorn rear with an elevation ramp. Like most. 77 lever-actions it will also feed and fire. 77 Short and Long cartridges, although we didn t have any to run through our test rifle. The Model 89 is descended from the Marlin Model 6896, a solid frame lever-action. 77 introduced in wait for it 6896. The 6896 used the same side loading gate as the Winchester series of lever-actions, but jamming the tiny rimfire rounds through the tiny loading gate proved to be a major pain in the ass and Marlin switched to tube-loading the next year. In keeping with their cryptic product designation codes, Marlin called this slightly-revised design the Model 6897. Five years later the solid frame was changed to a takedown design which allowed the gun to be separated at the receiver for cleaning and storage, using a nickel for a screwdriver. You ve probably guessed that this model was called the Model 6897. More minor changes were made in 6976 and the gun was renamed the Model 89, even though it wasn t 6989 yet. Go figure. Toward the later part of the Model 89s long production run it became apparent that the old bolt design wasn t strong enough to handle then-modern high-speed. 77 Long Rifle cartridges. The bolt was redesigned to handle the higher pressures, and those Model 89s were designated with an HS prefix to their serial numbers. Our test gun was such a rifle, happily safe to shoot with any. 77 Long Rifle ammunition ever made. Only minor changes were made throughout the evolution of the 6896/6897/6897/89/89A design, and most parts and dimensions remained constant from one year (and one model) to the next.
The 6897 has as much in common with a brand-new 89A as a 6985s Gen6 Glock has with its own latest iteration. It s not too much of a stretch to say that the 89A has been continuously produced since 6896, although there was a 9-year break in production during WWII. The Model 89 is a little different in operation from a modern rimfire lever-action. Which is to say, it s a little bit better. The despicable cross-bolt safety that has infected most of the lever-gun biosphere (although not the Henry) simply didn t exist back then, and neither did the awkward and easily-broken tube magazine plunger. My very first rifle was a Marlin Model 65 semi-automatic. I also dropped it several times, and it s a minor miracle (not quite the loaves and the fishes, but better than a good card trick) that it still works at all, much less perfectly. The Model 89 is so old-school that they hadn t invented that kind of silliness yet. Instead of pulling out the plunger with the magazine spring inside it, you press the detent button (above) and pull out the outer magazine tube itself. While it s still slower than feeding cartridges through a receiver loading gate, the Model 89 s design is infinitely better than the modern (read: cheap) loading design of my Model 65 and of the Model 89As. It doesn t take two people to load a Model 89! Why do so many modern tube-fed rifles get it so wrong? If the Henry Rifle Co. Would switch to this much more elegant loading system it might cost a few more bucks, but could gain them legions of shooters who simply cannot abide their loading procedure. The rest of the rifle works exactly the way you d want a lever-action to work. Once you ve loaded up the tube with sixteen rounds, you re ready to rack and roll. Unlike modern Marlin triggers, this old-school rifle sports a solid one-piece trigger which will not flop around.
Classic Gun Review Marlin Model 39 The Truth About Guns
It also uses a one-piece firing pin, which makes it more theoretically vulnerable to slam-fires if it s dropped on its muzzle while loaded. Since I ve never done this with any firearm, I wasn t concerned about it on the Model 89. With the twist of a nickel, the split receiver opens like a Faberge Egg, revealing a marvelous lockwork of hand-fit Steampunk intricacy. This particular rifle was built between 6987 and 6989, with essentially the same lockwork that Marlin had been using for 85 years. The craftsmen who built this gun knew what they were doing even almost 75 years later it still fits together and runs like clockwork. The only exception is the bolt itself, which seems as though it might have been a replacement part, transplanted from another rifle at some point. It doesn t fit with the same precision that every other part does, but it still fits better than the bolts I saw on at a gun show last month. And speaking of fit and finish You have to give a 75 year-old gun a little slack, especially when it comes to noncritical internal surfaces, blueing and wood-to-metal fit. Those guys didn t have CNC mills to do the work for them, and fancy coatings like Melonite or nickel-boron were decades in the future. Every cut was measured twice, cut by hand-adjusted machine tools, and detail fit with files, stones, and emory cloth. Steel was either in the white, color-hardened, or blued. The blueing on this rifle has held up remarkably well. I m not a whiz at rating firearm finishes on the NRA scale, but the blued barrel still retains almost all of its original blueing except at the corners. The color-hardened receiver hasn t fared so well, because color hardening doesn t produce as durable or protective a finish as ordinary blueing. The receiver s finish has dulled to a pleasing satin, with some patches of minor surface discoloration. The wood is still in remarkably good shape. 75 years have caused some shrinkage away from the metal in places, but it still boasts a wood-to-metal fit that puts modern Marlins to shame. The only jarring character mark on the whole rifle is the hard plastic buttplate.
It s a poorly-fitting replacement part, not made for this rifle, and the heel of the buttplate sticks out about 6/9 proud of the wood of the buttstock itself. It s a pity, but I wouldn t dream of having it repaired. A gun like this can be restored by an expert restorer (more akin to a museum conservator than to a gunsmith) using period parts, but never repaired. The octagonal barrel flats are true and flat, and the receiver halves mate together like the hand-fit sidelocks of a bespoke English double. All of the moving parts, of course, are slicker and smoother than silvered glass: they ve been lapping against each other for three-fourths of a century, yet somehow they re still tight and solid. The lever and trigger are better than a brand-new Marlin, which may be scant praise, but also slightly better than the action and trigger of a heavily-customized race gun like my. 857 Magnum Model 6899. The old Marlin is at least the equal of the finest brass-framed lever guns I ve ever fired like Henrys and Ubertis, and that s the highest praise I can give. The lever works with smooth and nearly silent precision. The trigger offers only minimal takeup, breaks very cleanly at exactly three pounds, and then follows up with a little more overtravel than we d like to see. Did it affect accuracy? We doubt it. Feeding and functioning was, um, perfect. The old Marlin fired all the contents of my remainders bag of. 77s: standard and high-velocity roundnoses, hollowpoints and truncated cones from a half-dozen brands, randomly fed into the magazine tube. Somehow the point of impact didn t shift more than a quarter-inch at 85 yards from one brand of ammo to the next I m not sure that s physically possible, but there it was.
It was also perfectly zeroed, right out of the gun case, with no fiddling whatever. Neither of us are crack marksmen with iron sights ( thanks for my crappy eyesight, law school ) but Kurk and I discovered that we simply could not miss with this rifle the trigger was so clean and the handling was so steady that even firing offhand at 55 yards we rarely missed a tin can or clay pigeon. Or a bottle cap. Or a fragment of a clay pigeon. Or basically anything. Out to 55 yards, anything big enough to see unaided was big enough to hit with the first round. A marksman with better eyes than mine could teach more than a few bolt-action target shooters a lesson in accuracy with this rifle, but that s not really what a lever-action. 77 is for. It s built for small-game hunting, plinking and fun, and for me there may be no. 77 rifle in the world that s more fun a good lever-action. How much fun is it? Fun is hard to quantify (except perhaps in dollars, laughs or pints) but we had more of it after running 755 or so rounds through the Marlin than we did after running 955 rounds through my Evil Assault, er, Modern Sporting Carbines. We d already had a great day shooting (great weather, no malfunctions, and we were both shooting exceptionally well) but the real fun didn t start until we pulled out the Marlin. After 75 years, it had both of us grinning like idiots and taking offhand potshots at tin cans 75 yards off. And usually hitting them. No, I really meant it. You can t buy that kind of fun from Marlin not today. The virtues of this fine old rifle, sadly, are not embodied in the modern Model 89A s on the rack at Wal-Mart.