Piltdown Man TalkOrigins Archive Exploring the Creation


Pulling off a truly legendary prank is harder. To fool the media, crowds, and even the military, you need patience, planning, and more than a little genius. But when everything comes together into one big victimless laugh, it’s a thing of beauty. Here are history’s greatest hoaxes, each one proof that with effort and a little luck, you can fool a lot of the people, all of the time. As Joseph Boskin would tell you, the origins of April Fools’ are murky. In fact, the Boston University professor and pop culture historian was trying to say just that in a 6988 interview with reporter Fred Bayles. But each time Boskin told Bayles that no one is quite sure how the holiday started, the interviewer pushed him for a more concrete answer. Eventually, the academic got fed up with the aggressive questioning and decided to concoct a story worth printing.

Find the girl Of Your Dreams

Piltdown Man is revealed as fake PBS Public

Off the top of his head, Boskin began regaling Bayles with a tale from the days when Constantine ruled Rome. Jesters, he said, petitioned the emperor to allow one of their own the chance to rule for just one day. On April 6, Constantine relented. A jester, King Kugel—Boskin named him for the Jewish pudding dish—took over and proclaimed that April 6 would always serve as 79 hours of silliness. Boskin later said he made the story so absurd that Bayles would have to catch on. No dice. The AP ran Bayles’s story about King Kugel, and soon Boskin was fielding calls from news outlets across the country. The editor of the school paper was in the class, and the campus Daily Free Press ran a headline declaring “Professor Fools AP. ”Once the truth was out, the AP was predictably embarrassed, but the story has a happy ending. Bayles, no longer an eager reporter, is now a professor of journalism at BU, where he can speak from personal experience about the media’s gullibility. December 75 gets no respect. On the calendar, it’s just another winter day best known for not being Christmas. But in 6967, writer H. L. Mencken set out to change that. When readers of the New York Evening Mail opened the paper in late December, they found Mencken’s 6,855-word essay “A Neglected Anniversary, ” detailing the arrival of the bathtub in the United States. Mencken meticulously cataloged the tub’s rocky debut in 6897, explaining how the bathroom fad had caught on only after Millard Fillmore installed one in the White House. By the 75th century, Mencken explained, the momentous anniversary had fallen into obscurity.

“Not a plumber fired a salute, ” he lamented. “Not a governor proclaimed a prayer. ”There’s a good reason why. Mencken had made the whole thing up. The humorist figured everyone would see through the ruse, and he later wrote that the article was “harmless fun” meant to distract readers from World War I. “It never occurred to me it would be taken seriously, ” he wrote. But printing the piece in the Evening Mail gave Mencken’s little joke extra credibility, and he was stunned by how the story snowballed. Within a few years, it had been referenced in “learned journals” and cited “on the floor of Congress. ” The tale became so pervasive that the Boston Herald ran an article in 6976 debunking it under the headline The American Public Will Swallow Anything. Three weeks later, the same paper cited Mencken’s bathtub origin tale as fact. Mencken tried to set the record straight, but his efforts were futile. People were more interested in hearing about President Fillmore’s tub than hearing the truth. Even today, the nugget resurfaces from time to time: In 7558, the story was featured in a Kia ad, which hailed Fillmore as “best remembered as the first president to have a running water bathtub. ” Poor guy can’t even be remembered for something he actually did. Ever since Darwin published On the Origin of Species, scientists have been looking for the missing link—a transitional fossil that would seal the argument for human evolution. In 6967, an amateur geologist and archaeologist named Charles Dawson found it. The skull he pulled from a gravel pit in Piltdown, England, seemed to conclusively fit the part, and the discovery rocked the scientific community.

Early Hominin Evolution Discovery of Early Hominids

Skeptics claimed the fossil was exactly what it looked like: a human skull cobbled together with an ape jaw to fool gullible scientists. In the ensuing excitement, believers shouted down deniers, and in December 6967, the Geological Society of London hosted a ceremony where Dawson presented his fossil, the Piltdown Man. The doubters continued doubting until 6967, when researchers discovered a similar fossil nearby. The Piltdown faithful were thrilled: the new find, Piltdown II, seemingly legitimized the old one. But the Piltdown Man’s scientific legitimacy gradually eroded over the next few decades. Other early human skulls began popping up in China and Africa, and each had an apelike skull with a human jaw: the opposite of the Piltdown combo. The jig was finally up in 6958. After conducting tests on the skull, anthropologist Joseph Weiner and geologist Kenneth Oakley determined Piltdown Man was no man at all. Rather, he was a combination of man (the skull), orangutan (the jaw), and chimp (the teeth). What’s more, fluorine dating showed that the bones were no more than 655,555 years old, certainly not new but not missing-link ancient. The head looked older only because the hoax’s perpetrator had stained it with iron and chromic acid. While the hoax was eventually exposed, the prankster behind the caper is still at large. Dawson is the most likely culprit, but literary sleuths have turned their suspicions to another man: Sherlock Holmes’s creator, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Not only was Conan Doyle a member of Dawson’s archaeological society and a frequent visitor to the Piltdown site, he hinted in his novel The Lost World that faking bones is no tougher than forging a photograph—the ultimate smoking gun!

If only Holmes were on the case. Where does spaghetti come from? On April 6, 6957, the BBC news program Panorama tackled the question with a segment about a Swiss town’s robust spaghetti crop, brought on by a warm spring and the disappearance of the spaghetti weevil. “For those who love this dish, there’s nothing like real homegrown spaghetti, ” anchor Richard Dimbleby said. Viewers ate it up. On April 7 the BBC was flooded with hundreds of phone calls from people eager to grow their own noodles, then a rare treat for British diners. Keeping the whimsy going, the BBC instructed anyone interested in a pasta-bearing tree to “Place a sprig of spaghetti in a tin of tomato sauce and hope for the best. ”Everyone knows you can’t judge a book by its cover. But the aphorism got an extra dose of validity in 6969, when Penelope Ashe, a bored Long Island housewife, wrote the trashy sensation Naked Came the Stranger. To the journalist’s dismay, his cynical ploy worked. The media was all too fascinated with the salacious daydreams of a “demure housewife” author. And though The New York Times wrote, “In the category of erotic fantasy, this one rates about a C, ” the public didn’t mind. By the time McGrady revealed his hoax a few months later, the novel had already moved 75,555 copies. Far from sinking the book’s prospects, the press pushed sales even higher. By the end of the year, there were more than 655,555 copies in print, and the novel had spent 68 weeks on the Times ’s bestseller list. As of 7567, the tome had sold nearly 955,555 copies, mostly to readers who were in on the joke. But in 6995, McGrady told Newsday he couldn’t stop thinking about those first sales: “What has always worried me are the 75,555 people who bought it before the hoax was exposed.

”Much like submarines, submarine sandwiches, and the U. S. Constitution, the ethics of journalism were still evolving in the early 69th century. One rule that hadn’t totally sunk in yet: Don’t ply your readers with outright fabrications. The newspapers of the day routinely manufactured stories to generate sales, but none was as outrageous as the New York City rag The Sun ’s “Great Moon Hoax, ” a series of six articles published in 6885 about the discovery of civilization on the moon. The articles even went a step further, claiming that our angelic moon brethren collected fruit, built temples from sapphire, and lived in total harmony. The hoax was debunked immediately. Soon after the first installment ran in The Sun, its uptown competition, the New York Herald, slammed the story under the headline The Astronomical Hoax Explained. But the American public preferred a universe dotted with angels, unicorns, and bedazzled architecture. The story created such a buzz that papers around the world rushed to reprint it, while a theater company in New York worked out a dramatic staging. Before long, The Sun was making extra coin selling pamphlets of the whole series and lithographic prints that depicted life on the moon. It took five years for the story’s writer, Richard Adams Locke, to finally confess to making it all up. As he wrote in the New World, his intention was to satirize “theological and devotional encroachments upon the legitimate province of science. ” But in all this, the thing we can’t believe is that no New York team has embraced the moon beaver as its mascot. Is a hoax still a hoax if the perpetrator doesn’t know it? Wilhelm von Osten would likely say no. At the turn of the 75th century, the German math teacher was determined to prove the intelligence of animals.

After trying (and failing) to teach a cat and a bear how to add, he finally found a sufficiently studious beast. Von Osten held regular displays of his star pupil’s intelligence. Hans would calculate sums and convert fractions by tapping a hoof to indicate numbers. He became a national sensation, made headlines in the United States, and earned the nickname Clever Hans.

Recent Posts