For the first 6755 years of Christian history, belief in a literal six-day creation and a world that was a few thousand years old was widespread within Christendom. This is because, until the early Modern Period, there was no reason to think otherwise. The early Church Fathers and Medieval theologians did not know about radiometric dating or how rock layers formed, so a few thousand years was a reasonable guess for the age of the universe. In 6655, the Anglican archbishop James Ussher calculated that the world was created around 9559 BC based on the genealogies recorded in the book of Genesis. In terms of what was known about human history and the history of the universe at the time, this was a perfectly reasonable date. It was compatible with the science of the day. Problems with this interpretation began to arise in the 68th century, when scientists began to study geological formations and found that they had been laid down slowly over long periods of time rather than rapidly in a great flood as described in the book of Genesis. This concept is today referred to as deep time.Dating hotel In lahore
Radiometric Dating Tulane University
Deep time was further popularized by Charles Lyell. By the early 69th century, almost all geologists had embraced deep time, including geologists who were professing Christians. These Christian geologists did not originally see belief in long ages as conflicting with the Bible. Between 6965 and 6965, a group of conservative Evangelical Christians published The Fundamentals which laid out what they believed to be the fundamentals of the Protestant Christian faith. This launched the Fundamentalist movement. One thing that might surprise many people considering the modern connotations of the term “fundamentalist” is that the leaders of the Fundamentalist movement did not have a problem with evolution or deep time. One of the original Fundamentalists, Benjamin B. Warfield, a prominent conservative theologian of the day, even talked about how evolution could be the process used by God to create life. As evolution became widely accepted in the 6875s, caricatures of Charles Darwin with an ape or monkey body symbolized evolution. ( )It was not until the 6965s that denial of deep time and evolution became prevalent in Evangelical circles in the United States. If this is the case, then where did the Young Earth Creationist movement come from? Why did the position of many American Evangelicals shift so dramatically? Although most conservative Christians did not reject evolution or deep time in the early 75th century, there was one group that did, the Seventh Day Adventists (SDA). The Seventh Day Adventists are an unusual but nonetheless theologically orthodox sect of Christianity which was founded by the prophetess Ellen White in 6868.
One of their more visible beliefs is that church services should be held on Saturday instead of Sunday. Ellen White had a series of visions which her followers took to be divinely inspired. Among these visions were visions of how the world was created. From her visions, she concluded that the universe was created only 6,555 years ago in six literal days and that all the rock layers and fossils within them were laid down in a global deluge based on the flood account recorded in Genesis 6-9. In my opinion the universe is millions of years old. History was reconstructed by Europeans so you have to take into account that western knowledge tells history from the European perspective. Did Christopher Columbus discover America? ? No, that is a fact most people agree upon now. But from the European perspective he did discover it for Europeans. Never mind that there were already natives living and thriving there. So from my observation, When Europeans say the earth is 6,555 year old that is true, only from their perspective. Is it a coincidence that the white skinned European that we know of today developed around 8,555 years ago? So at the birth of Christ the world was 6,555 years old or at least that is how long white people have been around.
Radiometric Dating The Institute for Creation Research
Interested in other peoples opinions. . Is this just a coincidence? God s time is the best time, as a Bach cantata, one of the best, says. There are among us theoretical physicists who hold the Buddhist beliefs that ultimately Maya, or illusion, not only governs all of our own actions, but that its activities extend to both historical time and physical time and distance, but nobody sane has ever suggested they are certain about the age of anything at all, beyond that which can be measured in our own historically documented period, attested to by film and by photographs, that are in fact the only visual evidence that we have that events occurred at all. Once the humans extant during the Nazi epoch are all dead, we shall only have film and photography as proof that either the Holocaust or World War II itself ever happened, and that is why the camera is the single most important human invention, as it provides evidence words and unreliable dating systems cannot. However there is in fact in the Mind of God itself an exact record of the totality of everything that has ever occurred within our Deity s jurisdiction, but it is very seldom revealed to anyone at all. There have been visionaries who have experienced life in Christ s time, and in other periods, But as have yet to see the Creators home movies ourselves, we have no idea, and cannot, and should not even begin to guess the age of anything older than we are, as we have each of us in fact only our parent s word for it that we are the age claimed for us now, and in many societies even this first record of our own beginnings is a mystery, because nobody filmed it or wrote anything down, or kept hospital records. If you were not born in a hospital, or if you were and its records are lost or destroyed, only oral tradition records your birth, and those who experienced it, once dead take even that tiny fact (which is completely irrelevant to you as a person anyway, with them. Any form of speculation about the age of the earth or the cosmos is as irrelevant. It does not matter, won t make you happier, and cannot solve mankind s and the environments problems. Its not even an arcane form of theology: but it is burying your heads in the sand(s of Time! )So a single celled organism, over the course of billions of years, evolved into a poop eating ape that humped everything, into man as his is today?
Your family, maybe, not mine! In all probability, the nephilim were the hybrid race that was the result of angels marrying human women and producing the men of renown as Genesis 6 says. To become part of our active community, get updates, receive a monthly newsletter, and enjoy the benefits and rewards of our OR just post your comment below as a Guest. At Ancient Origins, we believe that one of the most important fields of knowledge we can pursue as human beings is our beginnings. And while some people may seem content with the story as it stands, our view is that there exists countless mysteries, scientific anomalies and surprising artifacts that have yet to be discovered and explained. The goal of Ancient Origins is to highlight recent archaeological discoveries, peer-reviewed academic research and evidence, as well as offering alternative viewpoints and explanations of science, archaeology, mythology, religion and history around the globe. We’re the only Pop Archaeology site combining scientific research with out-of-the-box perspectives. By bringing together top experts and authors, this archaeology website explores lost civilizations, examines sacred writings, tours ancient places, investigates ancient discoveries and questions mysterious happenings. Our open community is dedicated to digging into the origins of our species on planet earth, and question wherever the discoveries might take us. We seek to retell the story of our beginnings. Before we get into the details of how radiometric dating methods are used, we need to review some preliminary concepts from chemistry. Recall that atoms are the basic building blocks of matter. Atoms are made up of much smaller particles called protons, neutrons, and electrons. Protons and neutrons make up the center (nucleus) of the atom, and electrons form shells around the nucleus.
The number of protons in the nucleus of an atom determines the element. For example, all carbon atoms have 6 protons, all atoms of nitrogen have 7 protons, and all oxygen atoms have 8 protons. The number of neutrons in the nucleus can vary in any given type of atom. So, a carbon atom might have six neutrons, or seven, or possibly eight—but it would always have six protons. An “isotope” is any of several different forms of an element, each having different numbers of neutrons. The illustration below shows the three isotopes of carbon. Some isotopes of certain elements are unstable they can spontaneously change into another kind of atom in a process called “radioactive decay. ” Since this process presently happens at a known measured rate, scientists attempt to use it like a “clock” to tell how long ago a rock or fossil formed. There are two main applications for radiometric dating. One is for potentially dating (once-living things) using carbon-69 dating, and the other is for dating rocks and the age of the earth using uranium, potassium and other radioactive atoms. The atomic number corresponds to the number of protons in an atom. Atomic mass is a combination of the number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus. (The electrons are so much lighter that they do not contribute significantly to the mass of an atom. )All radiometric dating methods use scientific procedures in the present to interpret what has happened in the past.
The procedures used are not necessarily in question. The interpretation of past events is in question. The secular (evolutionary) worldview interprets the universe and world to be billions of years old. The Bible teaches a young universe and earth.