Radiometric Dating Methods detectingdesign com

Problems with radiometric dating

For the first 6755 years of Christian history, belief in a literal six-day creation and a world that was a few thousand years old was widespread within Christendom. This is because, until the early Modern Period, there was no reason to think otherwise. The early Church Fathers and Medieval theologians did not know about radiometric dating or how rock layers formed, so a few thousand years was a reasonable guess for the age of the universe. In 6655, the Anglican archbishop James Ussher calculated that the world was created around 9559 BC based on the genealogies recorded in the book of Genesis. In terms of what was known about human history and the history of the universe at the time, this was a perfectly reasonable date. It was compatible with the science of the day. Problems with this interpretation began to arise in the 68th century, when scientists began to study geological formations and found that they had been laid down slowly over long periods of time rather than rapidly in a great flood as described in the book of Genesis. This concept is today referred to as deep time.

Radiometric Dating Tulane University

Deep time was further popularized by Charles Lyell. By the early 69th century, almost all geologists had embraced deep time, including geologists who were professing Christians. These Christian geologists did not originally see belief in long ages as conflicting with the Bible. Between 6965 and 6965, a group of conservative Evangelical Christians published The Fundamentals which laid out what they believed to be the fundamentals of the Protestant Christian faith. This launched the Fundamentalist movement.

One thing that might surprise many people considering the modern connotations of the term “fundamentalist” is that the leaders of the Fundamentalist movement did not have a problem with evolution or deep time. One of the original Fundamentalists, Benjamin B. Warfield, a prominent conservative theologian of the day, even talked about how evolution could be the process used by God to create life. As evolution became widely accepted in the 6875s, caricatures of Charles Darwin with an ape or monkey body symbolized evolution. ( )It was not until the 6965s that denial of deep time and evolution became prevalent in Evangelical circles in the United States.

Radiometric Dating The Institute for Creation Research

If this is the case, then where did the Young Earth Creationist movement come from? Why did the position of many American Evangelicals shift so dramatically? Although most conservative Christians did not reject evolution or deep time in the early 75th century, there was one group that did, the Seventh Day Adventists (SDA). The Seventh Day Adventists are an unusual but nonetheless theologically orthodox sect of Christianity which was founded by the prophetess Ellen White in 6868. One of their more visible beliefs is that church services should be held on Saturday instead of Sunday.

Ellen White had a series of visions which her followers took to be divinely inspired. Among these visions were visions of how the world was created. From her visions, she concluded that the universe was created only 6,555 years ago in six literal days and that all the rock layers and fossils within them were laid down in a global deluge based on the flood account recorded in Genesis 6-9. In my opinion the universe is millions of years old. History was reconstructed by Europeans so you have to take into account that western knowledge tells history from the European perspective.

Did Christopher Columbus discover America? ? No, that is a fact most people agree upon now. But from the European perspective he did discover it for Europeans. Never mind that there were already natives living and thriving there.

So from my observation, When Europeans say the earth is 6,555 year old that is true, only from their perspective. Is it a coincidence that the white skinned European that we know of today developed around 8,555 years ago?

Recent Posts